
Why I am Forking my Content

The only thing that still gives me a headache is how to deal with comments; I don't want comments on my articles anymore (after 20 comments thing usually get erratic). There is no flickr for UX discussions; disqus doesn't cut it for me. Currently I'm thinking about creating an uxforum on a separate site and place a link on each article that says: "Discuss this on xyz.com". What's your take on the whole blog-commenting problematic?
I came to a fork too, a month ago, and like you (and Yogi Berra) I took it - separated my less frequent essay-type content (at blogger) from my more frequent short updates (at posterous).
To paraphrase what you wrote: every great blogger reinvents him/herself. I am not a great blogger, but I admire great bloggers like you.
Please continue the good work - I wish you the very best!
I think a lot of the conversation are going to get fragmented unless you specify one as the primary place (I would suggest friendfeed)
We chatted briefly in Hamburg, and I mentioned the magical number 111 -- but you know there are well over 111 MILLION domains... but then again: what matters (i.e., reliable, trustworthy information) can primarily be found using the Wisdom of the Language ( http://gaggle.info/miscellaneous/articles/wisdom-of-the-language ).
Some people get this (primarily people like Esther Dyson, Barry Diller -- or maybe rather IAC and/or CBS) but most people still think that metadata happens on the page. Well, here's another clue for you all: the metadata is in the URL (and specifically in the domain name -- it's the medium [the medium which is the message ;] ).
And I commend you for pioneering and scouting out the wider web.
And I've decided to try out this posterous software too (I think Ive seen it a while back, but since it didn't use the wisdom of the language, I forgot about it) - maybe the people who run it will "get their act together" + get a real domain name sometime...
;D nmw
Leave a comment...
More great Posterous themes at themes.posterous.com.


