PR Pros on Press Releases - Meh
"(only) 49% of today’s professional communicators say they think press releases are 'as useful as ever,' according to recent poll of corporate communicators conducted by Ragan Communications and PollStream."
And on why we can't kick the drug...
"The poll also found that another 33% of the the 401 respondents see press releases as 'a necessary evil that won’t go away soon,' in large part because of disclosure rules for public companies set forth by the US Securities and Exchange Commission."
And how social media is filling in...
"One of the main reasons for the decline of the press release is the recent explosion of the use of social media in public relations and the perception that releases are less relevant in those venues. A majority (64%) of respondents who issue releases say they target them most often to print outlets, while 23% send them to online news and financial sites."
It's been awhile since there's been some fresh logs to throw on the press release bonfire. You have to wonder if the laws were changed if that would mark the end of an era.
Still press releases have their place - especially in financial situations. Also let's not overlook the potential SEO value too.
Over time though our reliance on them will wane as people demand more real-time engagement that's human to human and action oriented.


Comments 11 Comments
The rules have changed.
For example, at the end of every press release, most AGORACOM clients insert a 2-line blurb advising shareholders to ask questions on the company's electronic shareholder forum. It works because this month alone we've had over 125,000 unique visitors and 7M page views.
What this may serve to do is get investors and IRO's comfortable with the process and to the point where they simply issue notice & access releases along with the blurb, as opposed to asking them to go cold turkey.
Thoughts?
Regards,
George
And from a financial perspective, press releases distributed over a commercial newswire that vets issuers and is a trusted source for media and financial audiences, are an important statement of record for public companies.
KISS - Yes, keep them simple. And, even simpler....
TPR - Twitter PR anyone?
STOTTRP - Send them only to the right audience.
OOTTBF - Or, optimize them to be found.
TANAC - They aren't a PR crutch anymore. in fact, they never were for pros.
There’s no question that press releases have diminishing value as a media relations tool (in fact you could argue that media relations itself has diminishing value as a media relations tool). But at the same time, releases have more value than ever as a way to syndicate content quickly across the Web. Some PR folks have suggested switching to the term “news release” (vs. press release) to reflect this new reality. Also keep in mind that with online syndication, there’s a good chance that many consumers may not even differentiate between a news release and a bona fide news story.
Finally, news releases can work very effectively within a larger social media framework… After all, you need content that can be linked from all those tweets -- and linking to a news release that’s syndicated on a news site such as Reuters may appear more credible (rightly or wrongly) than linking to post on your corporate blog.
"That said, jargon-laden, unfocused messages don't perform well with any audience, or with search engines. The key, in my mind, whether issuing a release over a wire, preparing a pitch or crafting a social media campaign is honing the message to fit the audience."
Scary? Yes, unless the context- and the quality-- warrants it. Press releases are going nowhere.
As for the disclosure issue? It's still comfort food, even if the format is not required. If releases are geared to being useful rather than being a crutch for a lack of...anything, then they are quite useful indeed