With the utmost respect, I have to agree with Chris here. Further, is 'lifestreaming' the same as being ubiquitous over the social web? There is a weight behind good content that aptly crosses channels... which is why many of us were shocked by your decision not to 'blog' anymore - you've written such great stuff!
1. Create great content
2. Put it everywhere
Sorry, that neither captivated me nor held my attention.
I think it is also important to note we're in an age of discovery when it comes to the web. So it's difficult to determine if "lifestreaming" is going to catch on - or if it will just tire the mainstream out and have them scurry back to slower mediums - like say blogging. The only real certainity is that web communications isn't going any where. It's the formats and platforms that are up for discussion.
Like most, I'm also frustrated by my inability to keep up with the fast streaming Twitterverse and Blogosphere, knowing I'm constantly missing out on interesting and useful insights.
Solutions? (I'll bite, and volunteer the "missing" 5% ) -
(1) Watch hashtags that are important to your areas of interest, because they move more slowly (the contemplative lagoon for Marcus) and it's easier to keep up. TweetDeck rocks for this.
(2) Subscribe to blogs and follow people ONLY that (a.) have interests like yours or (b.) contribute content with higher signal than noise on topics you tend to care about. Not sure? Follow them, it's easy to change your mind.
(3) Engage in conversations and form relationships. Try a #chat.
(4) Ignore follower counts (I'm still working on this one, I think there's a recovery group for it).
Ok, you'll have to fine tune. Perhaps indefinitely. And yes, it involves some work. But SM streams are not meant to be passive, like blindly surfing the net, or flipping channels on the TV until something sufficiently mind numbing comes along. SM is at the other end of the spectrum, for those with some energy - you have to think, engage, react, reflect, brainstorm, make some tactical decisions, and maybe, one day, you might even get someplace.
Try doing that with the remote. And I wouldn't recommend doing it in traffic.
Unless of course you're driving.
Lifestreaming is the media equivalent of multitasking. Teens get it because they've always done it. The older you are, the less time you've had to internalize multitasking and what it means in your daily life. When my startup began testing an SMS concierge service a few years ago, the more experienced hotel concierges were uncomfortable with the requirements of being always on. It took time for them to realize that not every comment demanded an immediate response.
Lifestreaming means using tools like Twitter to have a gentle yet firm presence in the places brands want to be.
Lifestreaming works well to aggregate all the social media actions that a person or company takes. It doesn't help anyone "participate in all of the key social spaces," but it's a good record of that participation.
To "engage all day and night in a way that builds relationships," marketers need to show up in audience members' streams. That doesn't have to be a lifestream, just their singular Twitter, Facebook, or pick-your-social-network streams.
Chris Jones' (@sourcePOV) tips are a good starting point.
When it comes to the changes in media and how blatantly obvious what marketers need, scratch that, MUST be doing, I remember what Gary Vaynerchuck said:
If businesses don't adjust to the changes, they will die, plain and simple.
I think back to years ago when I first started reading you, when it was understood that to strike the balance between advanced and beginner readers, you have to write to the middle. Back when most comments were meant to add value to the conversation - anyone can criticize. It takes thinking to create, not just observation and what passes as quick wit.
Some negative comments on blogs these days are funny, or good observations, to be sure, even when they're argumentative. That doesn't make them any more useful. This isn't meant to bash anyone in this thread or anywhere on your blog who dares to disagree with the great Steve Rubel, lol....
It's just to say that... blog commenting is so much more than just knee-jerk feedback off the top of your head. Good comments can help build a business. I immediately want to know more about people who are building the discussion, whether with criticism or praise. I usually don't finish reading those that are tearing it down.
Others are constructive criticism, which is wonderful when it adds to the discussion - if you have a better solution or idea, the point of comments is to present it as Part of the criticism, or else you're just adding to what you've just said is the problem.
For me, the first part of the article wasn't necessary, but it was valuable, as entertainment, as a new way to present that conversation to clients, friends, customers. I can point them here to illustrate this point, which is one of the reasons why we share things in the stream in the first place.
The last part served as a good enough reminder- it captivated me and held my attention enough that I wanted to comment on it. Of course, reading the comments made me forget the one I wanted to make.
I appreciate the fact that you're not moderating the dissenting voices out, Steve, and simply ignoring those who don't add value. That makes sense.
But the noise is the problem with new media and I'm wondering when we'll be able to find a way to wade through it faster.
At the same time, the idea that every blog post has to be this perfect revelation of ground-breaking, life-changing information is what's killing anything that's not in the brief lifestream format to start with. That has to apply to commenting too I suppose.
And yet. We look to that lifestream in order to find deeper, more meaningful content. That's why it exists - we're all addicted to getting streams of "ooo shiny" to delve into.
So few things are glittering anymore though... never mind actually finding gold. You're still gold to me, Steve.
From a monetization point of view it's a nightmare, because I am rarely seeing the banner ads any more. While mainstream is going to stick with Facebook for the foreseeable. Sorry to say but the marketers are going to need to create some bots, "Captivate and Hold Attention Bots" that game the Social Networking System and Artificially push up the Social Share Rank for me to even have a hope of glancing at your content.
I'm working on a simple ad engine based on this, as a proof of concept. My hope is that I'm able to inspire talented and passionate developers to create dynamic and personalized slices of the web for each user. Targeted ads can help monetize our dearest content.