
Five years ago there was media and social media and the two were distinct. You know what was what. It was like there elephants and zebras. You knew the difference.

Five years ago there was media and social media and the two were distinct. You know what was what. It was like there elephants and zebras. You knew the difference.
Social Media is the actual physical media that is disseminated through social interaction and is created using highly accessible and scalable publishing techniques.
Social Computing is commonly associated with the technologies that enable distributed, user-driven communication and collaboration around Social Media. Examples of the technologies, or applications include: content authoring, content sharing, blogs, RSS, social networking, wikis, podcasts, ratings, tagging, P2P, micro blogging, and mashups.
Social Business is a term for the business practices emphasized by Social Computing over legacy systems that are more limited, less flexible, and less open.
Once again, hopefully I didn’t complicate something that you were trying to simplify.
Bryan
Re-reading him recently I think it's interesting to see how he felt media was "any extension of ourselves," which hits home your point in this post, Steve.
Media are …
1. Personal and bodily extensions, as in cell phones or Pattie Maes’ Sixth Sense computing developed by the MIT Media Lab.
2. Windows, as in portals on the world that bring the world to us and put us into the (action of the) world.
3. Mirrors, as in images that show us how to act, dress, behave and compel us to see ourselves and then look a certain way.
4. Connectors, as in social networking sites and tools.
5. Social structure organizers, as in the text creating the structure of priesthoods and churches, or as in John Medina saying the classroom (built around alphabetic organization) is a poor learning environment for the brain.
6. Conceptual organizers, as in linearity and sequential thinking flowing from the alphabet; or with the rise of the ‘global image economy’ observational learning—the learning from others how to act, dress, or behave—also rises while visual expression starts to change written expression
7. Third Places, as in Second Life or the virtual workspaces of a company like Sun Microsystems
Of course, media can have characteristics (such as mass, social, interpersonal, etc.) and based on these, can be classified into types. As characteristics overlap, our classification changes (that's what I think Steve means by the crossing of the zebra with the elephant).
However, in phrases such as "media business" or "media buying" we're not talking about theoretical distinctions and definitions. We're talking about specific communication channels that can be bought (rented) and dealt as commodities.
The question is interesting because the commodification of media (the business model, if you will) has changed. So, in this sense, the professions of "media business" or "media buying" have changed in ways that are just now being defined - how, I don't know, do you?
In the "brave new world" of convergence and connections there is no need for traditional media. I'm liking the idea of curation as the "role" of "new media." I'm putting all those words in quotation marks, because they are old words that have to have different meanings.
The horse is extinct, and so is the zebra. It's the centaur now:-)
(Hi Steve)
Sounds pretty fitting, doesn't it?
He is charged with helping clients identify emerging technologies and trends that can be applied in marketing communications programs. He also explores these topics on his lifestream site, a monthly Forbes.com column and in a bi-weekly AdAge column.
Steve can be reached via email at steverubel@gmail.com.
Note: Everything posted on this site is Steve's personal opinion. It does not represent the views of Edelman or its clients.