Blogs are Out of Beta, But Bloggers Should Always Be in Beta
The image above is one of the most important graphics I have ever seen. In fact I stare at it every day on my desktop to remind me that a) there will always be shifts in media and b) one format never supersedes another.
The blog is at a critical stage in its evolution. Blogs are out of beta. Blogs are the new normal. Everything is a blog. So what's next? Well, the format will indeed evolve into something new. I believe it will be the stream. Yet lots of folks this week are defending the blog like it's sacrosanct and untouchable.
Blogs are out of beta but bloggers, as pioneers, should always in beta seeking to grow and advance our beloved format, rather than be complacent. I am surprised that more of us aren't asking what's next for the almighty blog - and I am interested in your thoughts on this subject.



Comments 35 Comments
Up until now we have had communication tied into a specific media. Newspapers was printed on paper. Website and blogs was another platform. With social networks things started to get fuzzy, but social news is just out there.
That is, in my opinion, one reason why the blogs will be replaced by a stream. A blog is restricting you to the blogging platform. Where a stream is all about what you publish, not how it is published.
The blog is dying because it is restricting you to a specific format. It is not really good at tweeting, sharing pictures or links. A stream turns this upside down, and allows you to focus on the value of the content instead of how it should be published.
...and you (Steve) are doing some really interesting things with this.
Whatever replaces blogs is going to include all this goodness and more. Those who defend blogs will see all the bloginess in the next media and continue to call it a blog. Sort of like people calling Hulu, "TV."
The blogs of today are very different from the weblogs of old. What will it take before we no longer call them blogs?
I find this experiment/decision of yours interesting, because I too wonder about the best ways to be a contributor to the web, as well as a good user of it. But I don't know that doing something that results in more streaming, instead of more organized streaming, is the best way to go. I get inundated with just Twitter and FriendFeed and my Delicious Network and Google Reader, and I am sure many of my blog's readers do, too ... so I am personally disinclined to increase the flow of the stream to them, just as I am reluctant to have it increased for me.
Then there's the matter of what happens with all the great content you have already built up on your blog. You built a nice PR6 or PR7 last time I looked, but what will become of that now? Will the PR start dwindling to the point that the content no longer comes up in the SERPs? Maybe not ... Merlin hasn't updated in months and he still has a PR7, so maybe your content "stays live," but it would be something I would be concerned about.
Regardless, you are right that "we need to be in beta." I'm just not sure this lifestreaming thing fits the needs of our future.
But are you really sure it's accurate? Who is it for? In the 1960s only 10% consumption is TV. Today only 15%? Perhaps it's only meant to be a metaphor, but it would be nice if it reflected reality a bit more closely.
Blogs have not replaced more conventional online content, but they have affected it. And I don't think Twitter, Facebook and the like will replace blogs, but they will affect them.
The bottom line: Where does the thing that you want to tell fall on a few scales? How important is speed? How much are you looking for interaction versus comments after the fact? How detailed is your story and does it need the safety net of colleagues to edit and fact check?
Let's look at how Eric Ries of http://startuplessonslearned.blogspot.com/
might look at this. He talks about constant deployment and iteration. If our end goal is to really convince and persuade people to take some action (buy something from us, get us to consult, etc) then we should not be stuck on any specific media form, but really measuring all forms, diversifying, getting feedback and doing that which gives the best long term and short term results.
That would be true life hacking. To sum it up, I think different formats across different platforms and technologies are the best way to go but always be measuring.
It's just a case of the continent changing the contents.
I am also finding Posterous to be somewhat like Alltop - but in this case, it's my streaming magazine rack to see what's on the minds of who I think are the best and brightest in streaming.
I do lifestreaming --it's on Friendfeed.
Last thing about streaming --it's a lot of work to keep up with the tide, it's key to step out of the current once in a while --think on a rock(blog), then jump back in.
Now that posterous is getting even more attention, will be curious to see if new features are ramped up even more.
thanks for sharing.
I'm a believer in mixing it up, a bit like Steve mentioned above. My blog content gets syndicated outwards to places like Twitter, Facebook, RSS and so forth, and I use primarily Twitter but also LinkedIn and, more recently, Facebook to do the lifestreaming stuff and refer people back to my blog for more details.
I do think that blogs, especially the 'how to' style blogs, will always be important sources of information.
Not only can the blogmaster's original articles be good reference points but the information in them can be qualified and expanded on by commenters.
Still very much in the development phase, and since I'm creating this for everyone and anyone, I welcome anyone interested in helping me bring this idea to fruition, and create the voice of the people.
Please email me if interested, Kellen@My1stAmendment.com.
That says a lot.