25 Jun 2009

Why a Lifestream and Not a Blog - #1 in a Series

People are asking me tonight why switch from a popular blog to a brand new lifestream site with no Google juice and hardly any subscribers (although I am redirecting the feed). The reason is expression...

I can quickly post whatever is on my mind and do it via email from anywhere I may be in the world. Things like this (via)...

Lifestreaming Definitition

And it will syndicate it wherever I want it to go, like these sites...


...or any of these...
A blog is more structured. It's posts. This is freestyle.
26 Jun 2009

Why Lifestream? To Model Leonardo Da Vinci

 

"For me, I’m going to respect the needs of my community, and keep on blogging to distill what I think is important."
- Jeremiah Owyang, June 26, 2009 writing on web-strategist.com

There have been a number of posts since I wrote yesterday that I am quitting blogging in favor of lifestreaming. A few of you wrote in comments that you're dropping the RSS feed. I want to clarify a little more what this means. It's not more noise, less signal.

For my purposes, a lifestream is really a thought-stream consisting of insights, links, videos, photos and more. While some just lifestream in order to post a lot, I promise you I am going to only share quality bits about emerging technology trends. However, the difference is, that not every item will be an essay. It's different than Jeremiah's approach, summarized above.

I like to think of a lifestreaming as today's digital equivalent of Leonardo Da Vinci's notebooks. (Make no mistake, I am no Da Vinci nor do I think of myself in such a way. It's purely an aspirational metaphor.) Da Vinci recorded notes, drawings, questions and more in his notebooks. Some of these were quite mundane (grocery lists and doodles), others were not. But the body of work was over time, a view of a one individual's mind (in his case a great one).

My lifestream is not the same. But but the model is. I promise you that if you join me for the journey, we will learn about emerging technology trends together through links, images, video and audio. The difference though between this and a blog is that you will be right there with me as learn about and process new information, doodle about it in my online journal and and share/express my observations in real-time.

That is what will make this format different than my blog - especially the short bits, photos, videos and sound.

(Image credit : Wikipedia.)

29 Jun 2009

Frequently Asked Questions About This Lifestream

It's been a few days since I announced that I was abandoning my blog in favor of a lifestream. The move seems to be going well as comments have been coming in at a good clip. Here's a quick rundown answers to of some common questions that came in via Twitter, Friendfeed and comments...

Q) Why did you abandon your blog?

I have been blogging for over five years - and it has certainly worked well for me. However, in the last year, things really began to change. Blogging began to feel too slow and methodical in a world where apps like Tweetdeck bring real-time Twitter conversations right to our doorstep. At the same time, however, like Louis I have always felt it's important for me to have my own hub. But I want it to connect to the spokes.

In addition, I have been seeking a platform that lets me publish daily and do so from my mobile device. (I often spend more time on the web on my iPhone than I do a PC or Mac.) Since it works primarily via email, Posterous was perfect for my needs and when I began to see what you could do with it, I felt it was time to switch over.

Q) Do you think blogging is dead?

No, I don't. However, the blog format needs a reboot. 

For one, people don't have time to read as much as they used to. There's too much competing for our attention. This means you need to be creative to stand out. (This post is already longer and less visual than I would like it to be.)

Second, blogs must connect to social network hubs. Posterous lets me do so in a number of ways through auto-posting, but also by letting you send your comments into Facebook, Twitter, Backtype and Friendfeed.

Q) Cmon Steve, isn't this "lifestream" just basically a blog?

Sort of. The site is certainly structured like a blog. However, the approach is different. It's less formal. There will be more bits, fewer posts. What's more, I will employ creative ways to share and engage - such as mindmaps, image galleries and short videos. In addition, this will serve as a key way I connect to you on various social networks (see below).

Q) What is the focus of your lifestream?

My lifestream is focused entirely on daily links, observations and insights on emerging technology - primarily mobile, online and social. It's not a personal lifestream. I will stick to the topic. When I mention clients, I will disclose that I am doing so.

Q) Will this site aggregate your all your social network streams? I don't want to be spammed.

The lifestream will serve as a primary launching point for how I send content into social networks. New items will get auto-posted on YouTube, Flickr, Twitter, Friendfeed and Facebook, where we can discuss and debate further. However, the site will not aggregate all of my social activity.

Every post will be high quality and I will strive to cap the volume to no more than five to seven items per day. If you want more, you can track all of my activity and discussions on Friendfeed, including blog comments, my full Twitter stream and more.

Q) Will you still write essays?

Absolutely. However, there's a difference between what I wrote on ye olde blog and here. 

On the blog I would think about a subject, gather up links and evidence and make a case, then ask you for input. Here I might post breadcrumbs that solicit input that then lead to an essay or maybe a video. In addition, to that point. I will be doing a lot more with multimedia - photos, short-form videos and audio.

Q) Are you nervous Posterous could go belly up one day and leave you high and dry?

A) That certainly is a concern given their size. However, I looked into it. The Posterous API supports a full export of my content. It's also all backed up in my Gmail. Plus the domain is mine. So, worse case, I can move if I have to. But I am rooting for them.

If you have other questions, or even better, ideas for me, please leave them in comments or on Twitter, Facebook or Twitter.
30 Jun 2009

Evernote + Lifestream = ???

Evernote yesterday gave user the ability to share any notebook. I am already keeping a notebook in Evernote of things I want to add to the daily lifestream. What if I were to make this notebook public so that you can see what's on my radar? Would it be worthwhile and what could we do with it?

21 Jun 2009

Posterous is Changing How I Think About Blogging

I have been giving a lot of thought to what the future looks like for blogging and where it fits in my life. I have no plans to stop, but as more action moves to the statusphere and my world gets more mobile, I have been looking for a new publishing approach.

Louis Gray, Steve Gilmor and I had a rather deep discussion about this at the Friendfeed meet-up a few weeks ago. I have also had some good conversations about this with my contemporary, Jeremiah Owyang, as well as the folks who work for Six Apart, Blogger and Disqus.

Now that I have been at it for over five years, writing a weblog is starting to feel very slow and antiquated. It's like a singles tennis player who focuses solely on the baseline game, logging long balls back and forth. The statusphere, on other hand, is like playing doubles - and at the net all the time.

That's just one side of the story though. Another part of me feels strongly that in a world of "RTs" and "@s" a thoughtful blog post that adds value is downright refreshing. The right mix is a hybrid.

I have long been an admire of Jon Gruber, who writes the outstanding Daring Fireball weblog. He has the right model. All day long he's posting on his blog pithy comments with links to "finds." Occasionally, he writes a longer analysis as he did today about PR and journalism (a must-read by the way). He is also active on Twitter but for conversation. That's a great model to follow. But how do I do so when I am often on the go?

Enter Posterous. If you haven't seen it, Posterous is outstanding because it can serve as a front end for all of your out-bound publishing. It works entirely by email.

When I email Posterous the content immediately gets posted to my lifestream site, but it also goes to certain other venues depending on how I address the message. Posterous also has a ton  of other features that I love like easy tagging and also traffic statistics that you can see for every one of my posts. (For more browse this archive.)

Lately I have been shifting more of my reading/sharing to my iPhone. Some days I probably spend as much time or more time browsing the web from my mobile device than I do my laptop. Now that I have a new iPhone 3GS, I also want to do more with photos and video. Posterous seems like the great hybrid solution since I can share things in different places based on context and easily do so through via email.

So what does this mean for you as a reader? Nothing. You will get what you have come to expect from me right here on my blog. And if you subscribe my lifestream, you will get even more. My friends on Twitter, Friendfeed and Facebook will get a mix. It appears to be the ideal front end for the active publisher.

How do you decide what to publish where and when? One medium doesn't replace the other but we need more hybrids like Posterous.

Steve Rubel's Posterous

Steve Rubel (bio) is SVP, Director of Insights for Edelman Digital, a division of Edelman - the world's largest independent PR firm.

He is charged with helping clients identify emerging technologies and trends that can be applied in marketing communications programs. Rubel also explores these topics on his site and in monthly columns for Forbes.com and Advertising Age. He can be found on Twitter and Facebook as well.

Steve can be reached via email at steverubel@gmail.com.

Note: Everything posted on this site is Steve's personal opinion. It does not represent the views of Edelman or its clients.